Krec Wrote:yes , its way tougher assaulting with the new rules.:pullhair: More time is diff needed to be successful. Some of the older scenarios just dont have enough time given to the attacker.:mad: I dont mind the new rules if given proper time. But the defender has a big edge now and can really cause the attacker to use more time then before. Armor also is not what it should be in the open against infantry. Armor should maul inf in the open and it just doesnt do that now. My worst exp is failing an assault only to kill the unit from a desperate last hope long shot with min odds:conf:. Also when shooting , try and shoot multiple units at the same time,:boom2: for some reason i get better results. Keep playing and try and get a feel for whats going on. Nothin is for sure with the new rules.
I do not think that adding time to old scenarios is the answer.
It is part of the answer but, not the entire answer.
Force mix and the location of the victory hexes are the more important factors in adjusting scenarios to make them more in line with extreme assault.
I think the new formula lets the "game engine" and random die rolls take over the game. Plus, a savvy player can do some really gamey things that will effect most games where the attacker must advance into built up hexes to gain victory hexes. Simply adding turns will only allow the defender to exact a greater number of victory points from the attacker, as the attackers losses mount.
I do play games using extreme assault. I don't like them but, if my opponent wants to play with it on I am O.K. with it. I've even started adjusting my custom scenario designs to work with (or even without) extreme assault on. Early playtesting shows that they work, so far.
I just want the "chance" factors limited. It is why I asked for a lighter assault formula. It will allow skill back into the game?
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
