Nope, as long as you had a couple of SPs you would succeed 99% no matter what you were assaulting.
That is the point.
Quote:Based on the listed factors from the document on how it works, I figured common sense would make an appearance.
Hawk Kriegsman Wrote:Where have I lacked common sense in this?
Huibs post sums it up nicely.
Expecting old tactics to work, then being upset when they don't.
Hawk Kriegsman Wrote:For which you have not been ignored (by me at least) and have been thanked for.
And I appreciated and thank you again. It is a broad "You".
Hawk Kriegsman Wrote:Again not I. I have sent you files and you tell me. You don't have the right force mix.
And after I offered advice, you found excellent force mixes and succeeded exceptionally with 1.04 rules.
Hawk Kriegsman Wrote:Are you saying 1.04 assault is perfect?
Hardly. I'm saying it is not nearly as horrible as it is being made out to be.
Hawk Kriegsman Wrote:
Quote:As they should.
Well at least we have agreement here.
Amen!
Hawk Kriegsman Wrote:
Quote:Explain that to those that never got the hang of it?
That's not hard to explain at all.
They were not marginally competent at the game.
The only people who I have ever seen complain about surround, disrupt assault had rather poor win / loss ratios and from my experiece with some of them directly were not very good at the game in any phase of it.
Maybe the same can be said for the 1.04 Extreme Assault rules?
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
