Valor Wrote:Another thing that would ease the fate of surrounded, disrupted unit would be no "defenders captured" result. Instead, if unit loses the fight they have to retreat, if the path for retreat goes through enemy, undisrupted, more than "0" assault value unit, retreating platoon suffers additional loses.
I believe that tweaking the assault rules shouldn't go towards making it "extreme", it should go towards reducing automatic defeat to defender (which was never automatic, rarely but some high defense value units could survive)
Just my two cents
Regards
Slawek
Valor,
You make a valid point, soon it will get down to the winner of one assuaut will win the entire game. People who have made the assault a staple of there offensive MAY have to re-think their strategy. As I've stated before I'm not a big fan of the assault in the game,that said I'm playing Dan's D-Day scenario as a team game and using the extreme assault rule. I can't see disrupt Germans being overrun on the beach easily.If you want to make the assualt easier lets get rid of the big red " D " that makes it easy to see who to assault. How did commanders SEE into what the enemy was thinking or how he was acting 250 meters away. Good or bad those troops were fighting for their lives and the extreme assualt seems pretty good for people in that position. Surrender was always a last resort. Just my thoughts on this subject.
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
