Disabled Armor-Indirect by the Map-and more about Gardening Later

[Herr Straße Laufer]

Surely the key here is not whether people "feel" that a certain outcome is too much/too little, but whether there is actual quantitative battle experience. I draw your attention to Eastern Front II User Guide pp214-5, which cites some British experience, suggesting HE was the cause of of a tank casualty in 3% of cases.

Spot on Rod. :)
There is a ton of data concerning tank casualties from direct and indirect fire dating from World War One. The trouble is assembing it and then using it.
I guess most of us who have read a lot, concerning this topic, remember reading about disabled, destroyed, and disrupted tanks and formations.

I'd like to see the disable effect be reduced to 3% and an added "disrupt" formula to show the "realistic" effect of artillery fire. :smoke:



RR