OPEN MESSAGE TO MODERATORS AND MEMBERS

[Glint]

With all due respect, Jim, if you are gonna comment on me, get it right, if they're your thoughts, fair enough.
Yes, the past was dealt with. I'm not out for punishment for guys who attack me, just an apology would suffice. (Think I already posted that).
Upon the appearance of a certain person, I have had signatures aimed at me with some ridicule. I didn't stir up the past, someone else's behaviour did that, but apparently the moderators didn't agree.
You do me a mis-service Jim, - I have never asked for the case to be re-opened or new sanctions made, so your comment in public is totally mis-leading.
As said above, I am not out for a pound of flesh.
Yes, I was warned about taking the path of advance back channel and what perturbs me about that is, as I have stated here, my issue hasn't been understood at all and apparently, free speech that doesn't suit the ears of the powers that be will be stamped on?

''He is talking about the thread "What does the Blitz mean to you". He put up Post #10 , which quite bitterly spoke of his perceptions of injustice in a past issue. Given the title of the thread, I don't think his post was inappropriate. It could have been worded more carefully, perhaps. But it was not, I think, out of kilter with the thread title. My reading of his post was that, to Glint, the Blitz means unfair treatment and two sets of rules.
That said, the very next post, by the Club Commander (the thread originator), gently and tactfully rebukes him, for all to see. Surely that is penalty enough for merely speaking his mind on a past club matter that clearly pains him still.'' Quote KKR

I think Rod's comments highlight my points in this post perfectly.

I'll take the time out that I've earned so well Jim, as I said earlier, I'll just do the gaming and keep away from the forum.
Thanks a bundle.
I'd suggest you guys lock this thread, then I won't need to check for anymore mis-leading quotes about me.
regards
Peter