RE: Looking for an opponent for a PBEM game.
I find it interesting the subject of the rules.
I personally believe that there should be rules. If we want to be historically faithful will see that in wars there are no rules. I think if you have to pay attention to the relationship between the map size, type of battle and value for the purchase of units. To avoid excesses. I personally believe that putting too many rules will lose the tactical possibilities of the game. Once I spent about 30 rules. This reduces the scope of the game. Too predictable rules make purchases of units. True, after winning the best use units but lost quantities of choices. So rather than thinking about rules propose to study what I said earlier. Size of map-type battle-purchase value.
Pd: To those who point to the historical argument, I say that if I choose to France in 40 would inevitably be lost. If I find good research units and their capabilities.
|