Hank Wrote:I'm impressed with the activity of this thread. It makes me wonder though why its so active.
Has someone high up indicated there was going to be a round of changes to the PzC engine (and MC)?
Dog Soldier and I talked about such a thread but this got going all on its own.
Quote:I've seen these threads before and they did not get too far. If it does, I will get GS a list of the dialog boxes I want to be bigger however, its like he already said, those boxes if set to a specific size appear differently because of screen resolution. The best way is make the boxes sizeable. I don't know what programming language PzC uses but in VB and C, that's simply a property you set for the box along with the persistence.
I can't say why because I don't know - but making them all resizable is not going to happen. I've asked before and I get no where.
How far the thread goes is anyones guess - but I can say if people don't say which Dialogs need to be bigger and why, maybe even with examples why they are too small now, I can say with fair certainty that there will be no change.
Quote:Again, my other "want" is an independent AI artillery firing phase (separate from direct fire units (tanks, infy, etc.)).
Pass - not going to happen for any number of reasons, not the least of wuhich is file format in PBEM Games.
Quote:And I do like the discussion on Bunkers. You would think if you left an engineer in a hex for a few days, bunkers would magically appear ... having worked in engineering and construction for 32 years now. Its in an engineers nature to do such things. ;-)
With any luck, we'll get some traction on this - we'll see - no promises.
Glenn