SCORING

[Imp]

I think the original idea of all games awarding the same amount of points between the players is a good one he used 60 points which does not seem liked try 100

99 points Overwhelming Victory to the Winner
85 points Decisive Victory to the Winner
70 points Medium Victory to the Winner
60 points Minor Victory to the Winner
50 points Draw to both players
40 points Minor Loss of a scenario
30 points Medium Loss of a scenario
15 points Decisive Loss of a scenario
1 points Overhelming Loss of a scenario

Overwhelming & decisive score big because the other force in all probability has ceased to exist as a combat unit.
Minor should perhaps be 55-45 as not far off a draw & both forces probably able to fight another day.
Gap between top 3 Medium Decisive Overwhelming purposly as is because achieving is progresivly harder.

The winners score is based on how well he does so why isnt the losers if its a minor loss thats nothing like an overwhelming one.
I agree one should not surrender & it should not take a table to make you want to fight for those extra points but I have played people who surrender, incredibly early in some cases when you see what they had left.
The fact each game is worth the same amount of points might help with the tables to if each game is worth 100 points you know the average per game is 50 which just happens to be a draw but if thats not a factor then decisive & overwhelming should be loaded with lots of points as they are hard to achieve.

The suggestion about rating shots on target, planes artillery etc even if you could get the data as has nothing to do with how well the player played.
Buying the best equipment will help in this dept but countries experince rating is the big factor. Early Eastern Front Russia 55 exp vs Germany 75 more if buys elite units whos going to win the accuracy battle.