RE: Change of Personnel in the H2H Section
no probs VL, just my perceptive on it. What I'm saying is, if people test a scenario out between trusted friends and find it ok, why does it need to go through the process of h2h also? The more scenarios to play the better for all?
There's scenarios I've played where I've felt, I was at a loss pretty early on. I'd then choose not to play it again. Maybe, like others, I lost them due to inferior play against better players. The point is, there's many scenarios to play and many players with differing abilities, so the h2h section seems a bit elitist to me and unnecessary to promote scenarios to keep the site alive?
After all, how many people have played a scenario and it wasn't to their liking, despite being an h2h approved scenario? Doesn't that alone negate the h2h section's views?
Sorry to be negative, I always admire those who put their time into voluntary contribution, my post is just a view for discussion.
regards
Peter
|