SCORING

[Ratel]

BTW where did the Table of Ranks disappear to? I wanted to do a test on logics. What I mean by this is to take the different proposals' scoring for losses, and calculate how many minor losses I would need to have before I end up being a general. The result must be compared to the existing system. It's just as a matter of interest, but again compairing it to real life, I am sure no army will promote a guy if he keeps on losing. He must have at least some % of wins as well.
Like I said, I am just curious. I wouldn't like to complicate our scoring system by suggesting that the % of wins must now also be taken into account.

Lastly, on the old site I could see what the different columns on the ladder was for, but on the new site I can't. I cannot remember what ELO stands for?

---

Option A:
50 points Overwhelming Victory to the Winner
40 points Decisive Victory to the Winner
30 points Medium Victory to the Winner
20 points Minor Victory to the Winner
10 points Draw to both players
8 points Minor Loss of a scenario
6 points Medium Loss of a scenario
4 points Decisive Loss of a scenario
2 points Overwhelming Loss of a scenario

Option B:
Win 20 pts
Draw 10 pts
Loss 5 pts

Option C:
10 pts per game reported

I think that C would be equal to all players. A might work for Imp, win levels have the same points as current scoring, no fear for too quick point accumulation.

Oops, my maths let me down I forgot that we could score losses from 0 to 10 and not 0 to 5 as I mentioned in my earlier post.

I like Vesku's option A though.
And now I am keeping quiet till tomorrow at least. Feels like I have been posting too much during this last 30 minutes. Verbal diarrhoea.