RE: Which of these PzC would you like to see?
Well, using the same engine for Pacific battles limit the titles to Nomonhan39, Manchuria45, Filipinas 41/44 and Burma from 1942 to 1945 covering individual operations (can add the race in Malaya) rest of actions need a new engine were time and casualties have changes and of course a new urban/heavy defensive positions combat rule is needed but this is the same for PzC and MC.
Another interesting use of PzC engine is cover pre WW2 conflicts like Spanish Civil war (Madrid,Jarama, Guadalajara, north front that have half width of Tobruk to Alamein, Zaragoza race, Brunete, Belchite...) in a game like Salerno with individual battles, curious but the "decisive" battle of Ebro isnt the best to a game, are a Jarama37 mod using an old version of Kursk engine and give an interesting game for people who like infantry combat where the 2 sides have very similar armies. Other option is cover the Palestina/Egipt front in WW1 were Meggido is an interesting battle.
Talking about XIX... for EAW series i only see 1 title more that cover the wars of independent in south america, mexican/french war os more operational than tactical for me, another wars in XIX need more a napoleonic engine with changes but i think that now is more close a 2nd part of Renacimiento covering XVII century with battles in Europe and British civil war.
Well, we can only wait and first of all wait for a new PzC/MC title talking about another question is only a dream
|