So You Want Quality CS H2H Scenarios?

[Feldgeneral Hoth]

Hello.
As designer , I Agree with Mwest's words in all, but I know that testing scns is an ingrate task to many players. They prefer to play a nice, balanced scn where they put all your strategic knowledge about wargames. Design mistakes are not permited in custom scns because this is the cause of their battle failure and the report will be contradictory in their comments.

I enjoyed all player testing my scns and thanks for your help, but in order to H2H section, I prefer to do an own and major testing game with some of my regular opponents. But I would like see the H2h section with many players working...:conf:
Major testing mean we will stop the game when we found a big mistake in design, or major bug, retesting the same scn few times, change sides, probe new units performance, adjust turns and innovations....
We usually play the same scn 4-5 times in the testing phase, and we only report one time this work. The players prefer pick a scn fully reported and played by many players than others with an apparent single test.
Maybe this scn can be fully tested by own designer, but anybody knows this fact. :hissy:

The final aspect of all, the designer prefer wait for H2H section to get a labeled scn with quality stamp.

Just an idea: In order to get more info about the scns played, maybe the players when submit the final score to the Blitz they must be obligated to report the comments about design to get the points for the ladder.


Cheers.
Chema