So You Want Quality CS H2H Scenarios?

[Herr Straße Laufer]

In reply to your message Ed, -

I'm sure, if the requisite for a report on the game was part of the process, players would fill it in to get their' results logged?

I'm not into forcing players to do anything. Heck, if you play a game and decide not to report it that is your right?
Why force anyone to do anything? It's about the game and getting scenarios that are balanced and fun to PBEM?

My comments on the 'British football league' were relevant to H2H.
For example,if for arguments sake, you had 100 slots available for CS Scenarios then, after a period of time, say the bottom 10 or 20 played ones get relegated to a '2nd league' where, after another period of time, they get removed. In that time designers could receive an alert that the games are to be removed.
This would leave slots open for any new scenarios to be loaded throughout that period, H2H playtested ones could get priority?

Maybe you misunderstand?
H2H has limits to the amount of total CS scenarios, and the amount of scenarios by designer, that can be in the testing area. The scenario dBASE has no such limits.
And, why complicate a simple system?

I still believe that, a large scenario that takes maybe a year to test, would never see the light of day as H2H is at the moment, albeit it could be a superb scenario?

I still don't think a large scenario is suited to H2H testing. But, that is my opinion and I am openly not a fan of mega scenarios.



HSL