Confusing scenario ratings

[Montana Grizz]

I've read a lot of ratings and they serve some purpose, but are often confusing.

Same scenario being rated "moderately pro axis" and "moderately pro allies"?

I suppose ones rating might be influenced by performance and strength of opposition. As a buffer against ego destruction, I sometimes chose to believe that my opponent had some advantage other than superior Generalship

So, I have resorted to giving special attention to the opinion of those players with long-term experience and superior playing skills.

On the other hand, actual win/loss results can be most useful if games played are significant in number since one can at least imagine that there was some balance of opposition across the board in the 200+ reports listed :chin:

If you believe there is a more definitive method of judging scenario balance, I would certainly like your opinion.

Pat