• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Confusing scenario ratings
02-27-2010, 11:16 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-27-2010, 11:17 PM by Herr Straße Laufer.)
#3
RE: Confusing scenario ratings
Overall the game itself is fun to play. It's simple and still kinda unique in it's genre. :smoke:

I always look at the scenarios that have the most plays to find the ones that are fun to play ... and most likely the most balanced.
Why play a scenario that is not fun? :chin:

That said, fun is usually so subjective that you can find many opposite reports. One persons foot slogging adventure in paradise is another players foot slogging adventure in torture? One players cut and slashing armored thrust is another persons surround and overrun hell? Devil :conf:Whip

The most interesting report is the one from the player who has reported a match from both sides. In one report its moderately pro Axis when they lost it as the Allies. Yet in the second report it is moderately pro Allies when they lost as the Axis. ;)
That might make it both balanced and fun? :rolleyes:

cheers

HSL
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Confusing scenario ratings - by Montana Grizz - 02-27-2010, 09:33 AM
RE: Confusing scenario ratings - by Scud - 02-27-2010, 11:01 AM
RE: Confusing scenario ratings - by Herr Straße Laufer - 02-27-2010, 11:16 PM
RE: Confusing scenario ratings - by Von Earlmann - 02-28-2010, 12:05 PM
RE: Confusing scenario ratings - by Hobbes - 03-01-2010, 05:48 AM
RE: Confusing scenario ratings - by Scud - 03-01-2010, 11:05 AM
RE: Confusing scenario ratings - by Mike Abberton - 03-01-2010, 07:38 AM
RE: Confusing scenario ratings - by Hobbes - 03-01-2010, 08:02 AM
RE: Confusing scenario ratings - by Montana Grizz - 03-02-2010, 08:52 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)