RS: Terror on Tarakan has been H2H Approved!

[Glint]

'' On a different note, I know that "some" want to guide the discussion "their way". I'm more for a free form posting kinda guy. "Let the thoughts go where they may." If H2H was the discussion "up front" let it be H2H. If others want to shut down the discussion then maybe they can bring something constructive to the table? ''

I tried to do the positive Ed in a previous thread but then the mods dived in and thought I was locking horns with you again, hence, in the thread, I removed myself from the debate. In no way was I trying to 'guide' the discussion my way. I started trying to give some constructive criticism to the initial post, Mike even welcomed my input in the original thread. However, I think the mods are still monitoring us/me so, guess I can only contribute in a controlled environment?
Perhaps that's why my comments are being construed as negative, because I feel restricted in expanding my comments.
I've had a few PM's regarding this thread, personally, I think we're all men enough to debate on an open forum but,the mods decide otherwise, so we're stuck with that I guess.
To anyone concerned, don't PM me, if you have something to say, say it here please, I hate censorship.
Regarding Mike, yeah congrats for the efforts, truly. The original H2H thread tho had to be addressed and as a member, I'm entitled to my opinion as a member, as well as everyone else. If it causes angst to some then that works two ways?
Anyway, I'm waiting for the hammer to fall once again so enough said!
regards
Peter

---

...but post #6 by Foul...is foul. It is goading at it's most obvious (...and then we have...for what reason?...and etc.).

Yeah, then they wonder why they get negative reaction?