Actually the rating system is very fair. 8+ ensures the quality and the balance. We are not talking of 50% equals balance. We are talking about rating a scenario for it's balance of play.
If it can be won from both sides with relative equality then it should receive a higher or the highest rating for it's balance?
I think most testers misunderstand that concept. The better the balance the higher the rating. Balance is not based on fun to play. It is based on the ability to win it from both sides, all things (including player skill) being even?
I wanted fair ratings that were not based on the designers "likeability" or arm twisting. ;)
My problem was not in staying up with the scenario or the testers. I had a couple of testers that had real life issues which seemed to go on for a longer period of time than I hoped. They could not be remove individually from testing.
I was told that I could scrub all test reports and start over. Or, I could move the scenarios to the dBASE. Since we do not want to have scenarios sit in H2H for too long, and my scenarios were in the longest, and I did not want to scrub all tests to start over, I simply placed them in the dBASE. I would not restrict myself from what we want others to do.
H2H means that the scenarios is designed to be played versus human in PBEM. Neither scenario was uploaded with [BZ], which means that it made it through the H2H process. I used the Matrix template to describe the scenarios. There should be little in the way of confusion? :chin:
It's all good and part of the H2H system. It's the way it is going to work from now on too! :smoke:
HSL
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}