Thanks again, guys. VolcanoMan, since you're in the neighborhood I'd like to ask a couple of general questions about your scenarios.
I've read that they're balanced specifically for multiplayer. Would it be fair to say that they're better balanced for MP, in general, than the stock scenarios? For example, I read in a post about Minsk'44 recently that it's basically impossible for the Germans to win. While this makes sense, as they were greatly outnumbered, a well balanced game would make it fairly possible to win in terms of points. The German player could win half the time, even though he always gets stomped across the map. It's all in how
badly he gets stomped.
Do the alt scenarios do a better job in balancing
victory points, overall? I realize that they also strive for more historical accuracy in the units, which wouldn't of itself improve play balance.
Also, what do you think the best ways for a new player to familiarize with your scenarios would be? Are their detailed notes I can read, that highlight the main strategic possibilities based on the starting OOB's plus the timing and location of reinforcements?
Or should I just start hot seat games with myself and look around at what's where and what reinforcements look like for each side? I guess I'm just trying to get out of some work.:whis:
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
