(06-02-2010, 08:15 PM)Cpl K. Kat Wrote: But that's my point exactly. My non-gamey tactics arsenal is quite likely at least somewhat different in comparison to some one elses arsenal. Exiting combat units from map a case in point.
Remember, I believe I have never exited a combat unit but will defend my right to do so if I so choose! Unless I've agreed not to do so, which could be easily something I could agree into.
If we would find ourselves arguing about the truck-blocking technique at turn 24 of a 26 turn scenario, what would the outcome be? No ROEs in place, remember?
Who'd be right, who'd be wrong here?
Petri:
My head is "hurting" from this ping-pong debate! :eek1:
Here are a few "guidelines" you can follow to avoid potential conflict from different rule interpretations:
* Spell it out - be explicit on ROE that you always follow... especially when you play opponents for the first time
* Compromise - When issues arise, deal with them between you and your opponent. In my experience, most players are reasonable... and you can work out a compromise.
* Communicate - Often and as early as possible. If a situation arises during play... deal with it at that moment... don't wait until near game end and then mention it to your opponent.
Again, I don't believe the issue is what ROE are "correct"... and which ones are "wrong."
We can "debate" ROE until the cows come home... but we are NOT going to come to a common ROE set to be used by all players. Personally, I don't want a "force fitted" "standard" ROE because we are not "rules lawyers" here... but game players trying to have fun and enjoy our hobby.
The "issue" (if you wish to call it that?) is not being explicit on ROE prior to match start... and not communicating to your opponent during the match.
Regards, Mike / "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." - George S. Patton /