(06-03-2010, 02:05 AM)Cpl K. Kat Wrote: If there has been no discussion of ROE before the game commenced, it should mean there are no ROE of any sort in play, right?
Yes, I agree. But, players may be operating off an "assumed" ROE... again it goes back to communicating with your opponent prior to match start. Get both players on the "same page" so to speak.
(06-03-2010, 02:05 AM)Cpl K. Kat Wrote: You see, I am not discussing about the ROEs as such (until those cows come home). I just wanted to be sure that if there has been no communication - well, then there should not be any assumptions of game play either? Apart from Blitz ROE of course.
Yes, I agree.
(06-03-2010, 02:05 AM)Cpl K. Kat Wrote: We are perfectly in sync that yes, it is a good practice to agree about the rules before playing. No problem there at all.
Upfront, explicit ROE with on going communications and a willingness to compromise between players... goes a long way to overcome any potential in game issues or conflicts.
(06-03-2010, 02:05 AM)Cpl K. Kat Wrote: Sorry about the headache my friend :)
The aspirin are helping. :smoke:
Regards, Mike / "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." - George S. Patton /
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
