(07-20-2010, 07:36 AM)glint Wrote: Well, in my earlier post about waiting for bugs to be fixed and that putting me off purchasing MW, I would say that things like an Army HQ having no supply range is a pretty serious bug? I continue building scenarios and find niggly things wrong, after hours of work. Working on battle generator maps sees village/town hexes not sitting comfortably in the hex.
As mentioned before, when someone pays their money for a product, you should expect the finished product. How long is it now since JTCS was up for sale and we are still waiting for v1.05 to hopefully correct many bugs?
As far as the poll is concerned, I'm only interested in WW2. If there had been better support for correcting JTCS then I may have bought MW, just to sate my curiosity, but as it is, a big no!
Diagree here. JCTS is more of a finished product and has less bugs than the majority of other software, including that what most people will have to use daily in their work (speaking from experience here). Don't forget "Matrix" for JCTS is 80% Jason, 15% Wyatt and then 5% other folks who help him out. So about 1,5 person who have to do the support of JTCS AND the developement of MW in whatever time they have besides their daily job.
How many hours enjoyment did you have for the 30$ or so you had to pay for JCTS? And how many other PC games can match that record?
Let's not be over-critical.
Btw I'm sure MW will sell itself once word of mouth starts to spread from those who will buy it straight away.
I used to be interested only in WWII, but since I had the opportunity to make a few scenarios for MW, my interest in that era was raised as well. It can work that way around as well.
Huib