Ant Tank Guns Underrated in CMBB?

[Splork]

Ratzki - that's an intriguing set of rules, never played that way, but I bet it makes for quite an interesting game.

I haven't a clue as to whether AT guns are modeled appropriately according to historical factors, but I think DK kinda hit the nail on the head in regards to their modeling in terms of game balance - they tend to be priced fairly cheaply, so if they can take out one tank, they're more than worth it. If it ever gets more than one, that's a huge bonus.

My fear would be that any rules set that makes it harder to kill AT guns, while it might lead to "more historically accurate", it might also lead to an imbalance in the scoring, in that it makes a relatively cheap unit more powerful. Of course, I tend to mostly play QBs, where unit cost tends to be a bigger deal than in scenarios...