Ant Tank Guns Underrated in CMBB?

[Bear]

My experience is that tanks fearlessly knock these out quickly once the gun reveals itself, even with the gun in a foxhole and holding its fire until the range and target facing is good. Without having any technical data to support this, it would seem that a towed AT gun deployed would have these advantages:

More room for the crew than inside a tank leading to a faster rate of fire.

More stable firing platform for higher accuracy.

Room for as much ammunition as HQ can provide.

Lower target profile than a tank making it harder to hit (excluding Flak 88, etc.).

I seem to have a dim memory from ASL of using at least three, better four or five tanks to take out an ATG, expecting to lose probably two. On the surface, this appears a better fit for historical reality.

Any thoughts?

Yes, all except the fat ammo is right. The ammo is relative to the importance of the front and time before the action; then there's the right place-right time factor.
Go see our Gallery, see Kursk for a dramatic chain of AT combat. A good short book is Men Against Tanks, exciting and educational.