RE: Legacy Scenarios and Transport Values
While I agree with what Huib wrote as well - and it would be terrible if Rod could only have time to work with stock scenarios for the say next 12 months and nothing else - I believe there might be a balance to be achieved?
Using the good old 20/80 rule for priorities (as Rod would seem to be implying is what he plans to do anyway), I could see it being worth the effort to take those 20% of the stock scenario that have 80% of the fun factor involved, and convert them to a even better gaming experience.
Early war scenarios, and let us say that would include 1939 as well, as a next step, tweak and improve the 20% of the stock that are the creme de la not-creme, and we could then include them in the WiF experience that has just started, to get an idea how they play out.
I very rarely bother to play against AI, and would appreciate the H2H effort Rod is talking about. I would agree that not all scenarios should be touched, but the best stock (ie. original TS and early add-on scenarios) could be picked and improved.
I was quite surprised to find out, for an example, there is a lot of scenarios regarding Hitler's campaign at Norway, and while I have no idea how they play, how accurate the OOBs or the maps are, but if there would be some glaring errors it would be quite easy to fix them.
|