Scenario of the Month - Jan 2011: **Bitter Kuuterselka

Poll: What did you think about Bitter Kuuterselka?** You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Liked it a lot	12.50%	1	12.50%
Liked it somewhat	0%	0	0%
Did not care about it too much	0%	0	0%
Hated it	0%	0	0%
Played it, but don't remember it too well	0%	0	0%
Have not played (yet)	87.50%	7	87.50%
Total		8 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

[Show Results]

Thread Modes

Scenario of the Month - Jan 2011: **Bitter Kuuterselka

01-17-2011, 03:50 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-18-2011, 03:46 AM by Scud.)

Scud

Mister Moderator

Posts: 4,119
Joined: Feb 2008

RE: Scenario of the Month - Jan 2011: **Bitter Kuuterselka

Boisforas and I have just started this, with the designer's recommended optional rules. I'm axis, Eric allies.

My first thought after turn one: Axis has the initial advantage, dug in and bunkered behind tank traps and mine fields, so a painful approach for the Russians, especially with extreme assualt. I'm concerned, however, if/when they break through (and I assume they will at some point). I'm hoping to score enough SP's in the early going, then shore up the breakthrough points with secondary lines of defense...but the Finns secondary lines of defense might prove problematic against a charging red horde.

Map looks good and I like what I've been given. Dislikes: fixed units, not many; though; and I never like not being able to set my own op fire for the first turn (axis goes second, so op-fire is set by the designer). Other than those two small things, initially, looks good!

Dave

Resolve then, that on this very ground, with small flags waving and tinny blasts on tiny trumpets, we shall meet the enemy, and not only may he be ours, he may be us. --Walt Kelly