(04-06-2011, 07:06 AM)Huib Versloot Wrote: (04-06-2011, 05:21 AM)Jason Petho Wrote: (04-06-2011, 03:50 AM)Peiper Wrote: So i think thats the problem and not AF ON or OFF. My opinion is that AF ON simulated not a better and fair result for the allies tanks because also the war was not fair. But simulated a realistic and importend fact in wwII, the advantage some weapons against other weapons.
Agreed.
Jason Petho
I think the superiorty of the Panther and Tiger is well simulated with AF "off" as well.
My scns usually have the precise historical numbers of tanks for each model and each side. In these scenarios, where the numbers were correct down to the individual tanks, I looked at the loss rates and compared them to what really happened. I found those played with AF "off" to be far closer to reality, although both with "on" and "off" they were higher than in reality.
I also prefer the "feel" of the combat with AF "off". That is something that developed gradually, as I too started out with a preference for the rule "on". The silly retreat bug remains the biggest issue though and is about 80% of what I don't like about AF "on". AF "on" can only be tested seriously when this bug is corrected.
Just exactly what is the "retreat bug" you refer to?
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
