• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


need fanaticism rule
04-09-2011, 03:43 AM,
#4
RE: need fanaticism rule
(04-08-2011, 04:50 AM)bwv Wrote: thinking in situations like Brest, parts of Stalingrad, Sevastopol etc where often poorly equipped and trained units decided to fight to the last man. Eliminating disruption would accomplish this. Increasing the quality rating to A would imply improved tactics, reliability of weapons etc, eliminating the fire and assault penalties with lower quality units, which would not be realistic IMO
There could well be a downside to it though as I see it. Those units that held fast could well have been annihiliated when , under normal conditions , they might retreat and live to fight tomorrow. It might be worthwhile reducing their defence values somewhat to represent the greater losses they would take standing fast.
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
need fanaticism rule - by bwv - 04-08-2011, 01:50 AM
RE: need fanaticism rule - by raizer - 04-08-2011, 03:59 AM
RE: need fanaticism rule - by bwv - 04-08-2011, 04:50 AM
RE: need fanaticism rule - by Lien Leposh - 04-09-2011, 03:43 AM
RE: need fanaticism rule - by Aditia - 04-09-2011, 07:03 AM
RE: need fanaticism rule - by Jazman - 04-09-2011, 08:31 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)