• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Smolensk 41 opponent wanted
06-02-2011, 10:30 AM,
#13
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted
Wait, let me correct my previous post. Alternative indirect fire helps the defender. I've got some experience with this rule too. It makes it costly for the attacker to mass too many units in a stack because defending artillery will hurt all the units. The attacker will often need to mass units while the defender will generally have only one or two units in a stack.

So, sorry about the previous misinformation, but I think this rule strongly favors the defender. I don't like it anyway.
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by Metnegomilj - 05-31-2011, 12:20 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by larsonney - 05-31-2011, 01:45 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by Metnegomilj - 06-01-2011, 08:35 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by larsonney - 06-01-2011, 09:44 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by Metnegomilj - 06-02-2011, 01:11 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by Compass Rose - 06-02-2011, 02:47 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by Metnegomilj - 06-02-2011, 06:57 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by larsonney - 06-02-2011, 08:41 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by alaric99x - 06-02-2011, 09:54 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by Metnegomilj - 06-02-2011, 10:12 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by larsonney - 06-02-2011, 10:23 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by Metnegomilj - 06-02-2011, 10:27 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by alaric99x - 06-02-2011, 10:30 AM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by Metnegomilj - 06-02-2011, 12:21 PM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by larsonney - 06-02-2011, 01:03 PM
RE: Smolensk 41 opponent wanted - by Dog Soldier - 06-03-2011, 04:48 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)