• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Pet Peeve HQ abuse
06-10-2011, 08:23 AM,
#2
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse
To me, having an enemy HQ in the front line makes me happy, and I figure it is my job to punish that HQ while it is there. If I am not firing at that unit, I wouldn't expect it to have issues with command - one thing to remember is that HQs are made up of a LOT more men than in most of the games - whereas a divisional HQ might show up with 100-150 men, historically you would be looking at 500-1000 for US divisions, as an example. That applies to army and corps HQs also, and the impact on the enemy of having one of those high level HQs disrupted hurts a lot, so I am happy with how it is.

You abuse that HQ, let's not add a penalty to do it even more.

Rick
[Image: exercise.png]
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Landser34 - 06-10-2011, 07:29 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Ricky B - 06-10-2011, 08:23 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Landser34 - 06-10-2011, 08:29 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Strela - 06-10-2011, 11:16 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Glenn Saunders - 06-10-2011, 02:19 PM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by The SNAFU - 06-11-2011, 12:01 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Lowlander - 06-11-2011, 01:02 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Glenn Saunders - 06-11-2011, 07:37 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Lowlander - 06-11-2011, 10:10 PM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Dog Soldier - 06-11-2011, 08:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)