• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Pet Peeve HQ abuse
06-11-2011, 12:01 AM,
#6
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse
I agree with Glenn and do not agree with the notion of penalizing players for using HQ's in combat by reducing them to a totally inaccurate strength or applying penalties not already in place. For anyone with any experience and knowledge the only time one would use an HQ in battle is if there were no other choice to avoid being overrun or some other very uindesirable result. The fact HQ's do not have ZOC's, cannot dig in and if distrupted impact everything under their command is penalty enough IMO.
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. Winston Churchill
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Landser34 - 06-10-2011, 07:29 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Ricky B - 06-10-2011, 08:23 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Landser34 - 06-10-2011, 08:29 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Strela - 06-10-2011, 11:16 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Glenn Saunders - 06-10-2011, 02:19 PM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by The SNAFU - 06-11-2011, 12:01 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Lowlander - 06-11-2011, 01:02 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Glenn Saunders - 06-11-2011, 07:37 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Lowlander - 06-11-2011, 10:10 PM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Dog Soldier - 06-11-2011, 08:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)