• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Pet Peeve HQ abuse
06-11-2011, 10:10 PM,
#10
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse


Yu have to be VERY Careful implimenting something that on the surface and upon first read sounds like a good idea.

Lets say I asked for this as is above and John did it as it sounds easy - right.

Consider all the situations it would impact if "any HQ under fire should immediately become disordered"

There is direct fire...also on group where vis is long and cover is sparse.
There is also indirect fire at a spotted target
indirect fire at a ? target,
fire by Arty at a supsected hex
arty or air strikes at hexes uncovered by Air recon.

...so I say - be careful what you wish for.
And understand that things that sound simple often have other side effects and situation which you might not imagine that will come into play. Excluding some sitautions means making sure you understand EVERYONE and doing hte exclusions add layers to the complxity of the situation. We even had a strange case in Kh43 where one combat result was being negated ... cant recall the details but it was a complexed sequence of events - so when you take something like that and then add a new result to be included in the sequence which could in itself have 6 or 8 exceptions - something that sounds simple might indeed be more complexed than it looks.

Glenn


[/quote]

IMO, I don't wish to upset the goose which lay's the golden eggs.
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Landser34 - 06-10-2011, 07:29 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Ricky B - 06-10-2011, 08:23 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Landser34 - 06-10-2011, 08:29 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Strela - 06-10-2011, 11:16 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Glenn Saunders - 06-10-2011, 02:19 PM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by The SNAFU - 06-11-2011, 12:01 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Lowlander - 06-11-2011, 01:02 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Glenn Saunders - 06-11-2011, 07:37 AM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Lowlander - 06-11-2011, 10:10 PM
RE: Pet Peeve HQ abuse - by Dog Soldier - 06-11-2011, 08:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)