Tunisia'43 unbalanced scenarios.

[Arkan]

This is not a question of how balanced was the historical battle but of how balanced a scenario should be.
I was thinking that when it's a [HTH] both sides have or should have chances to win.
If a battle was unbalanced designers of the game can balance it with VH and number of turns.


"Does the title of the scenario not spell it out? Who would expect the Axis to win?"
Maybe everyone who want to play axis and have a chance to win... Once again where is the pleasure of playing if the only possible result is a major victory of one side. If it's a [HTH] scenarios Axis and Allied should be able to win. By "win" i dont mean win the battle but have enouth VP to obtain a victory...


"It will take the better part of a day to get those 80 AT guns into position to "blow up the bunkers". That estimate is without constant Axis artillery harassment. If you think the Axis can hold the bunker line indefinitely and "stuff" the opening Allied offensive, then you need to go get some books on the campaign and see this was just not possible."

4 turns are enouth generally... 2 to bring AT guns to position, a thirs one to disrupt axis unit in bunker and a fourth to assault it... No need at all of an entire day... I didn't said anywhere that this line should resist all the game but i think it should resist a bit more than 3-4 turns.