(11-15-2011, 10:09 PM)Kool Kat Wrote: My post was to (hopefully?) galvanize more players to get involved in play testing H2H designs... and not to criticize the scenario designers and their creations. :cool2:
Mike, I would love to see members test out scenarios in the H2H area. It is a fun thing to do and is very helpful.
"Criticize the scenario designers?" Who said that? :eek1:
And, "their creations" are what the members are rating for balance and fun.
Isn't that a process of criticizing? :chin:
I know that my issue with some of the designers, which was discussed long ago by many of the ladder officers of the club, was that they put a scenario design into H2H and then expect it to pass as is. Even the ones that are not balanced or fun to play. :eek1:
Or, they put it in H2H but take no active interest in promoting or improving it.
Or, they ignore any and all feedback from the testers and expect it to simply move on after low ratings.
Or, some might even ignore e-mails and/or PM's asking that they resubmit their designs or remove them.
Or, some do not bother to "approve them" and rename them with the H2H logo when they do pass?
That is how most scenarios sit in H2H.
Obviously, yours do not sit that long because you promote them and improve them based on player feedback! :smoke: :bow:
HSL