re: scenario design

[Herr Straße Laufer]

One thing I would say is, I've played a fair few games where I can't believe the poor attention to oob's. For example, getting disrupted units galore, only to find there are no leaders around to help raise their morale!

Disruptions and morale are more a factor of the individual units. Adding leaders is a matter of work, and taste, of the designer.
"Poor attention" to the oob? :chin:
Maybe the designer wanted it that way and you (the player) will have to live with it?
Units with high morale have a better chance of coming back on their own. Maybe the designer wanted to show that?
Who knows?
But, it does not have to be "poor attention" by a designer. It could be by design. :rolleyes:

I'd rather take time to get it as good as I can before throwing out sub-standard scenarios to all.

Thanks! You could also put it in the H2H testing area. If you had balance and fun in mind, and their are those who would help by giving you honest feedback?

But, remember, a designer needs to work to get a scenario through H2H testing? :smoke:



HSL

---

No, it is the same supply system as before. I think the CS manual didn't explain it properly, hence the general confusion.

If a Battalion HQ is low and ammo, it will perform a check against the Regiment HQ (if present), if the Regiment isn't there, it will use the Division.

If it passes, the Battalion HQ will regain supply.

If it fails, it will conduct another check against the base ammo level.

If it passes, the Battalion HQ will regain supply.

If it fails, the Battalion HQ will remain out of supply for the turn.

This is why I prefer to have low base ammo levels in my scenarios and campaigns, to ensure the player is using the supply system properly. Having full HQ's with an 80+ base ammo level is pretty pointless.

Jason Petho

Earl, I think what Jason wrote is what I know of how the supply system works. :smoke:



HSL