re: scenario design

[Kool Kat]

I am stating a point of view regards my personal choice regards H2H. Whether a scenario is good or crap is in the mind of the guy playing it, each individual will think differently.

Actually, that's not true.

You complained, in an earlier post (Post #42), playing scenarios with companies that were not added correctly to their parent organizations. Well, there's an example of a poor scenario design... that becomes very evident when you play the game and the units can't resupply? It directly impacts the game in a negative way and contributes to the game being "crap."

That's not an subjective opinion... but a fact.

Again, if developers don't adhere to the game scale... don't utilize correct and functional OOB's... and don't follow a myriad of other "good practices" when designing scenarios... the end result will be a poorly constructed game that nobody will play because these creations are flawed in so many fundamental ways?

I don't know of many players who would wish to play through such Frankenstein "monsters"... and than to declare... or believe in their minds... that such scenarios are good? :chin: