(11-22-2011, 01:01 AM)Gordons HQ Wrote: My Question is:- Would this scenario then have to be loaded for H2H testing as it is sure to be rubbished as unbalanced. In which case, is it the case that it would not be accepted and the members it was aimed at would not get a chance to try this out.
I can't think of any reason why a "historical" scenario could not go through the H2H process? :chin:
The scenario developer could emphasize that the depicted battle is "historical"... and as a consequence... "unbalanced"... so play testers would be urged to NOT evaluate "balance"... and in the "balance" evaluation category, maybe rate it as a "8"?
Another possibility... adjust the victory conditions so that both sides had "some" chance of either a "Draw" or "Minor Victory?" So, if "historically", a specific side captured an objective during that battle... maybe if the defender can retain that objective... with minimum casualties... a "Draw" or "Minor Victory" is possible?
Thinking out loud here? :chin:
I believe that the majority of "historical" scenarios are tested with the developers' "regular" opponents... and than uploaded into the dbase after a few rounds of play testing?
Regards, Mike / "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." - George S. Patton /
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
