Need CS Players to step up as Game Testers!

[Dan Caviness]

Hello All:

If my scenarios offend the H2H process then we can remove them. They don't test quickly, and therefore do not fit the expectations of some involved in defining what H2H should be.
No worries mates...if you want to remove them so be it.
No hard feelings, I get it.

Both scenarios of mine are being actively and currently tested.
My thanks to JVK, HSL, Von Luck, dawags, Smedly, Chuck10mtn, Jesse, Tiger88, and several others, etc., for their continued support.

Very few players are willing to get involved and test these large scenarios. It's not everyone's cup of tea, and so I can't get 4 test games recorded. When I do, and learn from the testing, if I make any modifications, I'm not allowed to "graduate" H2H as it is...I have to start all over from square one even though the initial ratings on the earliest version already met the criteria for H2H certification. That part perplexes me, but I suppose a designer could take a good scenario and modify it into a mess...so retesting it is...and another couple years go by.

In counterpoint, my endless hours of involvement testing these means I am seldom available to help others with their testing. My apologies to those I have not been able to help.

I've always considered myself a proponent of H2H testing and supported it to the best of my ability over the years. Sorry to be detrimental to the process. In spite of my large scenario addiction I have managed to help test several other scenarios and continue to do so because I believe in testing scenarios to help the designers improve their product.

In the end it's a tool, and tools should be used in my opinion.
While I don't agree that my scenarios are "languishing" anywhere either inside or outside of H2H, if they offend, or are taking up valuable space others could better use, please remove them.

Regards,

Dan