firing at hex with multiple targets

[PawelM]

Is this to liberal?
I suppose if adding targeting by unit type rather is too much, what everyone thinks of doing something about disparity in losess that can be inflicted by single direct fire action i described above? Anyone agrees some fix would be welcome by majority fellow players. Or perhaps i am the only one feeling changes can improve the game engine.

You raise an interesting proposal? :chin:

For me, with any possible change to the game engine... and your proposal would fundamentally change how direct fire is applied to enemy units... I always ask the following:

* How does it impact game play?
* Is it needed? Or is it a "nice to have" change?
* Is it a "high" priority on the list of other 1.05 patch requests?
* Are players willing to give up other proposed changes to accommodate this proposal?

I would also caution against making a statement such as "...by majority fellow players..." since the folks who read and respond to Blitz threads represent a "minority" and not a "majority" view of CS players.

Finally, for me, I welcome "change" that improves the CS game engine... as long as that change is thought out carefully... is needed.... thoroughly play tested... and implemented and deployed in a careful and thoughtful manner. :smoke:

I understand the implications are significant, therefore I started a discussion. I do not think at this stage it is even worth considering it for implementation with any update yet.

I would like to see more people confirm this is the way they would want to see direct fire to work. If I am only odd one out of the bunch feeling this is the way to go, then there is not much point dwelling on too much detail, wouldn't you agree.

I am for discussing the details and also am keen to hear proposals from others.
However for now, there is not as many people involved in the discussion (i.e. less than I hoped for), which suggests to me there is not enough interest in proposed changes to direct fire with multiple units etc.

Your comments are much appreciated. I would like to have more input from other as I did not have this proposal completely covered and I was hoping other would join in to shape a potential proposal based on the outline I proposed as a starting point.

:bow: