• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


HT optional rule
12-16-2011, 09:16 PM,
#2
RE: HT optional rule
I am not the greatest fan of personal rules of engagement. Having said that, I often do agree to them if someone mentions them clearly to me before a game starting.

These I could live with, I guess, although with no1 and no2 I do not have strong feelings for or against. If you live a unit at a risk for being assaulted by HTs, well you shouldn't.

However with no3 I could see this even as a potential 1.05 change request. Either class HTs as soft vehicles, leaving only tanks TDs SPAs as hard targets? Or create a class of their own for that?

I do agree a use of HTs to continuosly trigger op fire feels a bit 'gamey'. Anyway, one of those things I guess where I would simply request in an email that I would appreciate if my opponent would not do it anymore.

As I said I do not appreciate extra ROEs but would prefer to stick to my own interpretation of 'realistic' (now there's a touchy word as well) use of given unit in given situation.
Visit us at CSLegion.com
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
HT optional rule - by PawelM - 12-16-2011, 08:26 PM
RE: HT optional rule - by Crossroads - 12-16-2011, 09:16 PM
RE: HT optional rule - by PawelM - 12-16-2011, 10:21 PM
RE: HT optional rule - by von Manstein - 12-19-2011, 03:41 AM
RE: HT optional rule - by Otto von Blotto - 12-19-2011, 04:15 AM
RE: HT optional rule - by PawelM - 12-19-2011, 05:26 AM
RE: HT optional rule - by PawelM - 12-19-2011, 06:00 AM
RE: HT optional rule - by Otto von Blotto - 12-19-2011, 09:40 AM
RE: HT optional rule - by PawelM - 12-19-2011, 05:12 PM
RE: HT optional rule - by Crossroads - 12-19-2011, 09:50 PM
RE: HT optional rule - by PawelM - 12-19-2011, 10:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)