Some questions about France '40

[Volcano Man]

I just looked at that scenario and it's been played 20 times with two draws and 17 Axis victories and 1 Axis loss. Me, I just think F 40 could be a much more popular title if the French units had some decent morale and lower high command ratings to reflect the situation that actually happened. jonny :smoke:

What you may not realize is that that scenario was rebalanced again after it was played some 10 or so times. So, the overall results of the scenario doesn't really portray the recent changes to it. Maybe the GD should be rated as B, I don't know, I am not going to go in there with a sledge hammer and start making changes unless people actually play Stonne_Alt in its current form. I just don't see why this is such a big deal all of the sudden. I certainly don't mind changing the GD to B quality if the community thinks it best; but I need some proof/evidence that this is needed for game balance first, not just speculation.

Other than that, unfortunately I don't have time to debate or offer a detailed discussion of all of this (at the moment anyway). The F40 campaign is a totally different animal than F14, you can't really say that unit X has rating of Y in 1914, so why isn't it the same in 1940? AFAIK, the Zouaves in F40 are rated as B, so it is not like the French are short changed all around, and the 1940 French army's morale is nothing like what it was in 1914.

Still, the simple answer works here too: if anyone dislikes the unit ratings, combat ratings or OOB structure, then feel free to edit it to your own liking.