(03-08-2012, 06:21 PM)agmoss99 Wrote: Interesting question - I've recorded mine as individual games as the campaign tree can branch off in any direction so no two campaigns from the same game are likely to be the same in terms of size. Of course, trying to work out which exact scenario you are playing within the tree can be tricky and the HPS numbering system is not user friendly.
Even this is problematic. This is from my email to my campaign opponent:
Liebchen Wrote: When I tried to enter our round 2 game, which was essentially Approaching Abensberg, I realized that in the game there is an 03a_eckmuhl.scn and an 03h_eckmuhl.scn, which I assume are an AI game and an HTH game, respectively, although I can't verify that. But neither of these is the game that we played. (The 02 stand-alone scenarios in the game are about Teugn-Hausn.)
The game that we played had variables by virtue of it being part of a campaign. They have variable oobs, setups, and objectives, depending on how things go, right, and what choices we make? So I looked and there are a number of variants. As it turns out, we played either scenario Abens2aR.scn (French heading for Ratisbon) or Abens2aL.scn (French heading for Landshut).
I don't know how much difference there is between the 03a & 03h scenarios and the 2aR & 2aL scenarios.
Besides, since the Blitz keeps statistics on the scenarios, it seems wrong to record our game as the generic scenarios.
As curious as I am what your overall disposition is, I don't know if I want to come out and ask you, rather than suss it out during the course of play. So I'm not sure what game to report for round two, and probably won't for round three.
So, I thought that maybe this would help explain the dilemma behind my question.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to handle this?
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}