(03-24-2012, 11:25 PM)Herr Straßen Läufer Wrote: Winning a major victory as Allies, against an equal or superior opponent, and then saying it is well balanced may be stretching it a bit. But, that is my personal opinion.
Everyone who has participated in this thread has stated their personal opinion?
Ed, I consider your statements your opinion too. Not necessarily right... or wrong... but certainly your opinion.
IMO, as the designer of this scenario, I think it is safe to state that there needs to be more completed games before conclusions may be drawn on its overall balance.
(03-24-2012, 11:25 PM)Herr Straßen Läufer Wrote: PS. Please don't read this as an attack against any one member. I am trying to have a "gentlemanly" discussion on a topic using stats and not feelings. Remember the Allies win this more than they lose it, and much more so when the statistically superior opponent is the Allies?
Nobody has accused anyone of "attacks" in this thread? Again, we are referencing a scenario that has ONLY 5 recorded games (3x Allied wins / 2 Axis wins). IMO, more games need to be played before ANY conclusions on balance can be made.
Regards, Mike / "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." - George S. Patton /