(06-15-2012, 06:29 AM)PawelM Wrote: I suppose the discussion between members who would want to see ladder points to be purely competetive or awarded for myriad of activites could be endless.
As this thread obviously shows.
(06-15-2012, 06:29 AM)PawelM Wrote: I think bonuses for testin are relatively high. 20 x SM and then again for sugmitting the report means effectively 40x SM. Given that major win is 12 xSM this gives more than 3:1 ratio for test game vs a "normal" game.
I think your maths are out you only get one set of points as far as I am aware that includes the testing and submitting not points for each. so 20 X SM not 40 X SM
If it's too many points or not is up to the club officials to decide, as a show of who's good at playing there are already two very adequate indicators ELO and win loss ratio add to that each players profile shows what points are competitive and which are bonus why would you need total points as well.
People are giving up there precious game time that they could be acclimating games played and hopefully wins to improve the game for all at the moment they are rewarded for doing so and more people are involved, in the past they have not and less balanced games were developed.
Why not join in and test a couple as well it can only help the game develop in the long run.
Edit : poll answers
1: no
2: Don't care