RE: 3 things I'm tired of
I got aas well bored with this disrupt capture routine but I agree some scenarios are no go with EA in terms of balance. I prefer EA, but would never play EA off as allied for instance in A Legend is born. There is no way shermans can win without being able to capture disrupted panthers in this scenario. There is definetely too many big cats.
As for AF I think scale is ok and it is interesting option, but would do with some improvements. First of all a disrupted unit should loose its facing, i.e. be treated like for AF off. As I unerstand disruption it means a unit has lost its cohesion and is in disarray. Therefore one cannot expect all armor will be aligned to the same directio, but rather opposite?
So, this is for disrupted unit which retreat. If however a unit is retreated but not disrupted in the process, I would expect the unit should be assumed to be able toreatreat and position itself as it were in terms of facing as it has retained its cohesion. Change of facing costs 0 AP in the game and would not mean extra effort as assumed by the game designers as well. So therefore I second Askari idea for undisripted units forced to retreat
This joined with lack of facing for undisrupted units would make AF more sensible in my view.
|