• Blitz Shadow Player
  • Caius
  • redboot
  • Rules
  • Chain of Command
  • Members
  • Supported Ladders & Games
  • Downloads


Opponent for Waterloo 007
06-30-2012, 03:40 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-30-2012, 03:45 PM by Vincent.)
#19
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007
(06-29-2012, 04:46 PM)Al Amos Wrote: There is also an editor. Let me know when either of you post an "accurate" historical scenario. Time to put up or shut up, gentlemen. Making scenarios isn't as easy as it looks. Of course some folk just complain, and don't contribute to the solution of percieved "problems". Time will tell if you're just complainers, or not.

(btw, only a posted scenario will prove me wrong.)

al amos - scenario designer


Al,

I respect all the hard work designers put into scenarios, this isn't some blind criticism just for the sake of complaining. The fact is, these scenarios contain historical inaccuracies. There is to some degree, a limit upon which you can deliver historically accurate scenarios with the information available.

Unfortunately, this is not the case with HPS Waterloo. The scenarios suffer from a blatant disregard to the historical settings and are far from even a basic historical standard.

Although I can potentially still enjoy much of what this title has to offer, I can't agree that its research and design were historically based.
Quote this message in a reply


Messages In This Thread
Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Vincent - 05-01-2012, 06:38 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by agmoss99 - 05-01-2012, 09:22 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Vincent - 05-03-2012, 02:15 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Chosenman - 05-05-2012, 03:16 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Tim Cavallin - 06-27-2012, 02:58 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by tbridges - 06-28-2012, 01:39 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by jonnymacbrown - 06-29-2012, 07:52 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Havoc - 06-29-2012, 08:13 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by jonnymacbrown - 06-29-2012, 08:29 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by jonnymacbrown - 06-29-2012, 01:25 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Vincent - 06-29-2012, 02:35 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by jonnymacbrown - 06-29-2012, 02:56 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Al Amos - 06-29-2012, 04:46 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by agmoss99 - 06-29-2012, 05:43 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Vincent - 06-30-2012, 03:40 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by jonnymacbrown - 06-30-2012, 03:59 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by jonnymacbrown - 06-30-2012, 04:26 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Compass Rose - 06-30-2012, 03:08 AM
Ask and ye shall receive - by FM WarB - 06-30-2012, 10:23 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Compass Rose - 06-30-2012, 10:53 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by FM WarB - 06-30-2012, 11:05 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Al Amos - 07-01-2012, 06:58 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by jonnymacbrown - 07-02-2012, 07:33 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Al Amos - 07-02-2012, 08:58 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by jonnymacbrown - 07-02-2012, 12:51 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Al Amos - 07-03-2012, 08:32 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Compass Rose - 07-03-2012, 08:48 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Al Amos - 07-03-2012, 08:53 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Philippe - 07-04-2012, 08:38 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by FM WarB - 07-04-2012, 09:39 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Philippe - 07-04-2012, 11:54 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by FM WarB - 07-05-2012, 12:55 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Philippe - 07-05-2012, 03:32 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by FM WarB - 07-05-2012, 04:44 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Al Amos - 07-05-2012, 01:00 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Al Amos - 07-05-2012, 08:17 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by FM WarB - 07-05-2012, 11:54 PM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by Al Amos - 07-06-2012, 09:22 AM
RE: Opponent for Waterloo 007 - by FM WarB - 07-06-2012, 01:17 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)