"In the shadow of the hill" round 2

[noob]

I just want to say that i am quitting this tournament, it was a deeply flawed tournament to start off with, the randomness of the side and scenario allocation makes scoring meaningless, the scenarios are too long, and most are too one sided, given the scoring system being used, so all it really is, is an exercise in getting lots of people to play a certain set of scenarios as a group, which wouldn't be that appealing, even if it proceeded without the mind bending delays between each round.

I appreciate the effort put in, but my advice would be to use a better scoring system next time, namely, award passage to the next round to the players scoring in the top 50% of the Allied scores, and the top 50% of the Axis scores, that way force balance in a scenario is irrelevant, then allow all the players to play the same scenario each round, with the Axis players always playing the Axis side in every round, and vice versa, then after so many rounds, you would be left with a top Allied player, and a top Axis player, then they could play a h2h tested scenario to determine the overall winner, a bit like the superbowl.