(04-22-2013, 06:53 AM)Huib Versloot Wrote: The quality criteria of the H2H section and that of the 1.05 development team are not the same thing, so I don't think it would happen automatically without a second look. Maybe a couple of them are good enough to include. I'm not the final say here though, Jason is (I assume) so you know where to lobby.
Nonetheless it is good to try to deliver quality scenarios for the patch... if one is patient enough to keep them on the shelf for a while. I have a few waiting for what is it? 4 or 5 years...maybe even longer? I'd like to include new 1.05 features (that are still not programmed) before wrapping them up and releasing them to the public.
Huib
I disagree. I also assume that the players, both scenario designers and play testers, involved with the H2H Test Section, would disagree with your statements.
IMO, you owe your fellow players, scenario designers, and play testers an apology - but that's just me.
In any regard, Jason has replied to me in a separate message that he believes the inclusion of all CS H2H Approved scenarios is a great idea, as long as he has the scenario designer's permission to include their creations in the 1.05 patch!
So, all developers with CS H2H Approved scenarios - please contact Jason and grant him your permission to include your H2H Approved creations in the 1.05 patch!
Regards, Mike / "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." - George S. Patton /