(04-22-2013, 10:38 PM)Kool Kat Wrote: I disagree. I also assume that the players, both scenario designers and play testers, involved with the H2H Test Section, would disagree with your statements.
IMO, you owe your fellow players, scenario designers, and play testers an apology - but that's just me.
In any regard, Jason has replied to me in a separate message that he believes the inclusion of all CS H2H Approved scenarios is a great idea, as long as he has the scenario designer's permission to include their creations in the 1.05 patch!
So, all developers with CS H2H Approved scenarios - please contact Jason and grant him your permission to include your H2H Approved creations in the 1.05 patch!
An apology? For what exactly? You don't even know what the criteria in the past were before a scenario was accepted. For the upcoming MW and VN, I know that the current standards for the scenarios are even higher than they ever where in the past for JCTS.
Apparently I was told differently in the past by Jason about the H2H produced scns and that made sense to me back then and still does as far as I'm concerned. Maybe he has changed his mind in the meantime. Good for you.
By the way there are different ways to include them, as a separate package or modified with new upcoming features or whatever. I don't know what the plans are at the moment.
Apology.... yeah right.