Updated Normandy'44_Alt (third time, 13 AUG)

[Strela]

Yes, that sounds good to me, perhaps I can give the panzers regiments a 1% replacement rate. With their good supply level, it would cause a consistent trickle of replacements back into these units. 2% or higher would probably be too much/high to represent this aspect though, and it might encourage reckless behavior. It might even make sense to go with an even higher breakdown rate for this late war period too (1943+), say, around 15% or so. Going off my new standardized approach for 1943+ late period to be: allies 1/2 of axis breakdown rate, that would be a breakdown of 8% Allied, 16% Axis (in this campaign). The idea being that the actual breakdown rates would vary from game to game, but the ratio would not (during this period). What do you think?

In complete agreement. Some of the new tools we have in the game system and OB are allowing us to create this level of differentiation - particularly when compared to when the game was originally released. The values (with a wet finger in the air) for breakdowns etc. are a good starting position, but it will take play testing to prove whether you have it right.

David