(02-01-2014, 06:57 AM)berto Wrote: (02-01-2014, 01:55 AM)Otto von Blotto Wrote: Given a choice I think I would prefer a third way but the chances of that wish being realised is very slim indeed.
How so? Why is this something we might not look into "fixing"?
Hey Berto:
You were not on the scene when EA was first unveiled. It was originally intended to be mandatory and replace the CS "vanilla" assault rules. Players divided themselves into two camps - pro EA or anti EA. It got pretty nasty with some heated threads. After a significant uproar from players, Matrix relented and made EA an optional rule. There were also debates on the need to make EA less "extreme" - kind of tone it down some, but nothing came of this input. "Officially," at least when EA was made an optional rule, it looked like Matrix would not revisit the EA rule again.
Hopefully, with you on board, maybe its time to re-examine EA and its impact on the CS battlefields?
Regards, Mike / "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week." - George S. Patton /
Archived Forums
Help
Calendar
Member List
Search
){kind=link}
